Library

(click on title to download)  

Algaba, O. B. (2014). Impact study of the new sulphur regulations on a North Sea short-sea route (Master’s thesis). DTU, Department of Transport, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.

Bosch, P., Coenen, P., Fridell, E., Åström, S., Palmer, T., & Holland, M. (2009). Cost benefit analysis to support the impact assessment accompanying the revision of directive 1999/32/EC on the sulphur content of certain liquid fuels. Didcot, England: AEA report to European Commission.

Cullinane, K., & Bergqvist, R. (2014). Emission control areas and their impact on maritime transport. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 28, 1–5.CrossRef

EMSA. (2010). The 0.1% sulphur in fuel requirement as from 1 January 2015 in ECAs—An assessment of available impact studies and alternative means of compliance. Technical report of the European Maritime Safety Agency.

Fagerholt, K., Gausel, N., Rakke, J., & Psaraftis, H. N. (2015). Maritime routing and speed optimization with emission control areas. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 52, 57–73.CrossRef

Hader, A., Hübscher, A., Maatsch, S., & Tasto, M. (2010). Reducing the sulphur content of shipping fuels further to 0.1 % in the North Sea and Baltic Sea in 2015: Consequences for shipping in this shipping area. Bremen, Germany: Institute of Shipping Economics and Logistics.

Jiang, L., Kronbak, J., & Christensen, L. P. (2014). The costs and benefits of sulphur reduction measures: Sulphur scrubbers versus marine gas oil. Transportation Research Part D, 28, 19–27.

Kehoe, J., Nikopoulou, Z., Liddane, M., Ramstedt, L., & Koliousis, I. (2010). Impact study of the future requirements of annex VI of the MARPOL convention on short sea shipping. SKEMA study prepared for directorate-general for energy and transport. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.

Kehoe, J., & Woxenius, J. (2010). Assessment of the impact of the application of new sulphur limits to the Mediterranean and the Atlantic European seas. SKEMA study prepared for directorate-general for mobility and transport. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.

Kontovas C.A, Panagakos G., Psaraftis H.N. and Stamatopoulou E. (2015). Being green on sulphur: targets, measures and side-effects. in Psaraftis, H.N. (ed.), “Green Transportation Logistics. In Search of Win-Win Solutions,” Springer International Series in Operations Research and Management Science

Ljungström, T., Leyendecker, J., & Lemieszewski, S. (2009). Consequences of the IMO’s new marine fuel sulphur regulations. Norrköping, Sweden: Swedish Maritime Administration.

Malmqvist, G., & Aldén, B. (2013). Sulfur regulation in the Baltic Sea: Scenarios for the mid Nordic region—threats and opportunities. A North East Cargo Link II report. Sundsvall, Sweden: Midnordic Green Transport Corridor.

Notteboom, T., Delhaye, E., & Vanherle, K. (2010). Analysis of the consequences of low sulphur fuel requirements. Study commissioned by the European Community Shipowners’ Associations (ECSA). Antwerp, Belgium: University of Antwerp.

Panagakos, G., Stamatopoulou, I. V., & Psaraftis, H. N. (2014). The possible designation of the Mediterranean as a SECA: A case study. Transportation Research Part D, 28, 74–90.CrossRef

Psaraftis, H. N., & Kontovas, C. A. (2009, May 26–29). Ship emissions: Logistics and other tradeoffs. In 10th International Marine Design Conference (IMDC), Trondheim, Norway.

Psaraftis, H., & Kontovas, C. (2010). Balancing the economic and environmental performance of maritime transportation. Transportation Research Part D, 15(2010), 458–462.CrossRef

Schinas, O., & Bani, J. (2012). The impact of a possible extension at EU level of ECAs to the entire European Coastline. Note to the Committee on Transport and Tourism, Directorate-General for Internal Policies, European Parliament, Brussels, Belgium.